WHY OBAMA WILL BE A ONE-TERM PRESIDENT
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. There’s hardly a better vantage point to see why Zero’s re-election chances are zero than here.
This is a ridiculous place. Humorless, irredeemably boring, five million regimented people living in a desert wasteland that has no excuse for a city other than its rulers have countless billions of our dollars to spend on building it because here is where their fathers and their camels came from.
The only thing to do in this booze-less, fun-less town is go shopping for overpriced stuff with designer labels — when you’re allowed to. Get ready for this. Every shop, every store, every restaurant has to close – as in vacate and lock the doors – four times a day every day for Moslem prayers: at 12:30, 3:30, 6:30, and 8:30 pm for 20 to 40 minutes each.
The Mutaween religious police prowl everywhere enforcing the rule, and ride around in SUVs with loudspeakers warning everyone to stop what they’re doing and go to prayer.
Then they wake everyone up at 3:30am in the middle of the night via loudspeakers from the minarets to tell you to pray a fifth time.
No one would pay the slightest attention to this place if it weren’t for oil – and the hundreds of billions that we pay them, via buying their oil, to spread their Wahhabi religious poison all over the earth.
There are few things a US president could do to simultaneously and substantially improve our economy and our national security than to enable us and the world to be less dependent on Saudi oil by allowing maximal domestic oil & gas production right here in America.
As we all know, Zero is doing precisely the opposite. He is conducting a War on Oil – just ask most anyone in Louisiana for proof – instead. He’s also conducting a War on Jobs – just ask anyone unemployed. And a War on Business – just ask any entrepreneur. And a War on the Dollar – just ask anyone who buys food and gasoline.
Yet Zero’s War on the American Economy is not his greatest vulnerability – for there is another factor that will play an even larger role in his being a one term president. In fact, it will ensure his failure to get re-elected.
Think back to 2008. There was only one reason and no other that Zero was nominated, that the media swooned over him, that he was elected: he was black. That’s it. Period.
If Zero were white, with the same smile, voice, poise and charm, a just-elected freshman senator with the same pathetic resume of Harvard and community organizing, et al, no one would have paid the slightest attention to him whatever. His running for president would have been laughed at, dismissed as a joke.
But he wasn’t white, he was black, and that made the difference – all the difference. He wasn’t elected because of his empty message of "hope and change." He was elected because he was black. That is, white voters voted for him to expiate the chronic accusation of liberals that they are racist.
America is the least racist nation on earth. I defy anyone who disagrees to provide a counter-example: another country somewhere in the world that the person who disagrees knows from personal experience (having traveled extensively or lived there) to be less racist than the US.
Yet whites have been bombarded all their lives with charges they are racists. All their lives they’ve heard liberals condemn their country as "Racist America." So here comes this black guy that nobody knows anything about except some African from Kenya knocked up his teenage white mother in Hawaii, and he went to Harvard, and now he’s a senator, and he talks smooth and he’s got a nice smile.
So millions of these white voters, who can’t gin up any enthusiasm for John McCain, say to themselves, "OK, if I vote for this black with three Moslem names, it will prove that I’m not racist, his getting elected will prove my country isn’t racist, and all these liberals will STFU at last. At last we’ll be rid of this ‘racist’ crap."
That’s how and why we got President Zero. Except, of course, his getting elected did nothing to shut the liberals up. It made them louder than before. How many times have you heard some Democrat, some professorial egghead, some enemedia pundit, condemn any criticism of Zero as proof the critic is a racist? That the only possible reason for not worshipping Zero is racism?
Well, many millions of voters have heard that too. It rings doom for Zero in 2012.
The desire, the need, the compulsion of white voters in 2008 to prove they’re not racist is gone, it is history, been there, done that, not gonna do it again, forget it. White voters in 2012 will be voting on Zero’s merits, or lack of them, not his race.
Those merits are non-existent. His presidency is a total abject failure, his acceding to CIA Director Leon Panetta’s demand that SEAL Team Six be approved to kill Osama notwithstanding. The economy will continue to head off a cliff, and Zero is unwilling and unable to prevent it.
What makes it worse for the Dems is that they will double down on their racism gambit. Since they can’t offer any actual reasons or evidence to vote for Zero, all they can respond with is insults, like children on a school playground.
A perfect example this week (6/06) is the Chair of the Democrat National Committee, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, accusing Republicans of wanting a return to Jim Crow laws.
This lib lady is so brain-dead ignorant of her own party’s history she doesn’t even know that Jim Crow laws were created by Democrats who had run the segregated South as their private kingdom since Reconstruction.
But no matter – for she, like all libs and Dems, don’t know what else to do except to scream "Racism!" ever more hysterically. The more Zero loses popularity, the more they’ll scream, and the more they scream the more they’ll be tuned out by white voters.
2012 will not be the reverse of 2008. That would be white voters voting against Zero just because he’s black in 2012, when in 2008 they voted for him just because he’s black. 2012 will be the opposite of 2008 in that race is no longer an issue, the white guilt trip is gone, and Dem attempts to revive it will result in a backlash.
Zero’s margin of victory in 2008 was provided by white voters believing that voting for him would put an end to the white guilt trip. That margin of victory will not be there in 2012. Ergo, he will lose, big time. It’s really that simple.
Ps: If you want this caveated, yes, this requires a GOP candidate better than McCain, but that’s a very low bar. We all want someone fabuloso like Palin, but 2012 will be an ABO election (Anybody But Obama), so anyone sane and normal will defeat him. Not that we should settle for that. Palin-Rubio 2012!