This is going to blow your mind. Please be sitting down in your most comfortable chair, relax, breathe deeply, and have your favorite adult beverage at the ready – just sip between paragraphs or you might lose it.
The four Brunson Brothers all play the trumpet, and have a recording studio, Rock Canyon Studios, in Provo, Utah. Deron, however, is also a lawyer, a very smart lawyer who has cases heard in the Supreme Court. He recently initiated a lawsuit now stuck in Federal Court, with his brother Loy as the Claimant.
So Deron filed the suit again with Raland as the Claimant, filing it as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. in Utah 2nd District Federal Court on June 21, 2021.
And who are the Defendants in addition to Alma Adams? 385 Members of Congress (of whom Adams is one), plus Mike Pence, Kamala Harris, and Joseph Robinette Biden.
On what grounds?
That on January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding to count the electoral votes for the 2020 presidential election – during which 147 Members claimed there was factual evidence the election was fraudulent.
That the Defendants (named as “Respondents”), in refusing the request to investigate such evidence to determine its validity but holding the questionable EV vote in spite of it, was a clear violation of their solemn Oath to uphold the Constitution.
That a successfully rigged US presidential election has the same end result as an act of war, putting the victor into power by force or fraud, representing a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging the fundamental freedoms of the Claimant, all US Citizens, and courts of law.
In violating their Oath to protect the Constitution from such a fundamental threat, the Respondents committed an act of treason against the United States. The only proper remedy is for them is their permanent removal from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
In sum, the Brunsons pose this critical Question of Law:
“The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can’t.
Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 147 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election.
Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.”
What’s diabolically clever of them is not to claim the election was stolen, but that Defendants voted 377 against (plus 8 abstaining) the request of 147 of their collegages there be a ten-day audit of the election before certifying the EV vote on Jan 6.
Now about the timeline. The suit was filed in June of last year, and was dismissed last February. The Brunsons appealed to the 10th Circuit, then realized how they could file a petition for writ of certiorari (judicial review) directly to the Supreme Court. They satisfied the Clerk of the Court’s request for more information, with their Writ being accepted by the Court last month.
One week ago, November 23, Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward.
Ramand J. Brunson v Alma S. Adams is officially filed with the Supreme Court, docketed as Case 22-380. It’s worth your while to read it, if only to understand how well-argued in legal reasoning the case is made.
The nine Justices will meet soon to discuss the case and decide by vote if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will formally judge the case and decide by majority vote if the defendants should be removed from office.
At the very least, Elon Musk needs to blast this all over Twitter. At the very least, all America needs to thank the Brunsons for their heroism. To keep up with the case, see http://ralandbrunson.com/
For who knows – Chief Justice Roberts may decide to own up to the catastrophic damage he caused our country by refusing to hear Texas v Pennsylvania, and vote along with his four colleagues to save America this time.